Modelling and analysis of piezoelectric actuators with partially debonded adhesive layers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the modelling of thin-sheet piezoelectric actuators, the bonding condition between the actuator and the host structure can place a significant influence on the behaviour of the actuator. This paper provides a comprehensive theoretical study of the electromechanical behaviour of a thin-sheet piezoelectric actuator bonded to a host structure through a partially debonded adhesive layer under in-plane electric loading. The focus is on the coupled effect of the debonding and adhesive layer on the interfacial stress. The piezoelectric actuator is characterized by a general electro-elastic Euler–Bernoulli beam model featuring both axial and bending deformation. The theoretical solution of the problem is formulated by using singular integral equations, in terms of the interfacial shear and normal stresses, which are solved by using Chebyshev polynomials. The introduction of the adhesive layer in the model changes the singular behaviour of the problem. The current singular integral equations are shown to be effective in solving for both singular and non-singular stresses. Typical examples have been provided to show the effect of the geometry and the material property on the local stress field along the interface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".