Delta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling as a biomarker of postictal generalized EEG suppression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Postictal generalized EEG suppression is the state of suppression of electrical activity at the end of a seizure. Prolongation of this state has been associated with increased risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, making characterization of underlying electrical rhythmic activity during postictal suppression an important step in improving epilepsy treatment. Phase-amplitude coupling in EEG reflects cognitive coding within brain networks and some of those codes highlight epileptic activity; therefore, we hypothesized that there are distinct phase-amplitude coupling features in the postictal suppression state that can provide an improved estimate of this state in the context of patient risk for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. We used both intracranial and scalp EEG data from eleven patients (six male, five female; age range 21-41 years) containing 25 seizures, to identify frequency dynamics, both in the ictal and postictal EEG suppression states. Cross-frequency coupling analysis identified that during seizures there was a gradual decrease of phase frequency in the coupling between delta (0.5-4 Hz) and gamma (30+ Hz), which was followed by an increased coupling between the phase of 0.5-1.5 Hz signal and amplitude of 30-50 Hz signal in the postictal state as compared to the pre-seizure baseline. This marker was consistent across patients. Then, using these postictal-specific features, an unsupervised state classifier-a hidden Markov model-was able to reliably classify four distinct states of seizure episodes, including a postictal suppression state. Furthermore, a connectome analysis of the postictal suppression states showed increased information flow within the network during postictal suppression states as compared to the pre-seizure baseline, suggesting enhanced network communication. When the same tools were applied to the EEG of an epilepsy patient who died unexpectedly, ictal coupling dynamics disappeared and postictal phase-amplitude coupling remained constant throughout. Overall, our findings suggest that there are active postictal networks, as defined through coupling dynamics that can be used to objectively classify the postictal suppression state; furthermore, in a case study of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, the network does not show ictal-like phase-amplitude coupling features despite the presence of convulsive seizures, and instead demonstrates activity similar to postictal. The postictal suppression state is a period of elevated network activity as compared to the baseline activity which can provide key insights into the epileptic pathology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".