Hulless barley and beta-glucanase levels in the diet affect the performance of coccidiosis-challenged broiler chickens in an age-dependent manner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diet β-glucanase (BGase) depolymerizes viscous β-glucan into lower molecular weight carbohydrates, which might act as a prebiotic in chickens exposed to enteric disease. Coccidiosis-challenged broiler chickens were fed graded levels of hulless barley (HB) and BGase to determine their effects on growth performance. Broilers were fed high β-glucan HB (CDC Fibar; 0, 30, and 60% replacing wheat) and BGase (Econase GT 200P; 0, 0.01, and 0.1%) in a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement. A total of 5,346 broilers were raised in litter floor pens and vaccinated for coccidiosis in feed and water on day 5. Each treatment was assigned to 1 pen (66 birds) in each of 9 rooms. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. Overall, HB decreased body weight gain (BWG) and increased feed: gain ratio (F:G) of broilers. From day 0 to 11, BGase did not affect BWG and F:G, at the 0 and 30% HB. However, at 60% HB, the 0.01% BGase improved them, and the 0.1% BGase had no effect on BWG and increased F:G. For the day 22 to 32 and 0 to 32 periods, BGase did not affect BWG for 0 and 30% HB levels, but for the 60% HB, both BGase levels increased gain. The 0.1% level of BGase resulted in the lowest F:G for all HB levels, with the degree of response increasing with HB. No interaction was found for ileal digesta viscosity at day 11; the level of HB did not affect viscosity, but both levels of BGase decreased viscosity. At day 33, BGase did not affect viscosity at 0 and 30% HB levels, but viscosity was lowered for the 0.1% BGase treatment at the 60% HB level. In conclusion, HB reduced broiler performance, and BGase alleviated most but not all the effects. In young birds fed 60% HB, 0.1% BGase did not impact BWG and increased F:G.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".