MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096172165 · doi:10.5336/anesthe.2020-75419

Comparison Of Dexmedetomidine and Morphine For Postoperative Pain and Sedation Management in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Congenital Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Study

2020· article· en· W3096172165 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dilek Altun, Ahmet Arnaz, Abdullah Doğan, Ayda Türköz

Bibliographic record

VenueTurkiye Klinikleri Journal of Anesthesiology Reanimation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDexmedetomidineMedicineSedationAnesthesiaRetrospective cohort studyMechanical ventilationPain scaleIntensive care unitHemodynamicsMorphineCardiac surgeryBispectral indexSedativeSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: In this retrospective study, it was aimed to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and morphine on postoperative pain, sedation, extubation time and hemodynamics in patients who underwent congenital cardiac surgery. Material and Methods: From December 2012 to December 2013, 46 patients between 1 to 5 years of age, who underwent congenital cardiac surgery were included and divided into two groups based on the sedative regimen used in the postoperative period. Twenty-three patients (Group Morp) received morphine at an infusion dose of 0.01 to 0.04 mg/kg/h; 23 patients (Group Dex) received dexmedetomidine at an infusion dose of 0.05 to 0.5 mcg/kg/h. Pain scores were measured using Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS); sedation scores with the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS); and hemodynamic parameters were recorded with these measured values. Sedation debth was monitored by using the Bispectral Index (BIS). In this retrospective study, postoperative pain, sedation and hemodynamic effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients undergoing congenital cardiac surgery, and the effects of mechanical ventilation duration and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay were compared with morphine. Results: Mean doses of morphine and dexmedetomidine infused were 7.04±3.94 mg/24 h and 94.33±48.38 mcg/24 h, respectively. BIS values were higher in Group Dex than Group Morp (p<0.01). Mechanical ventilation duration was shorter in Group Dex compared to Group Morp 5.74±1.98 hours vs 7.83±3.08 hours) (p<0.05). The length of ICU stay and other outcome measurements between the two groups were similar. Heart rate was lower in the group Dex only in the first two hours (p<0.01). CHEOPS pain scores were similar in two groups (p> 0.05). RSS scores at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th hours were higher in Group Dex than Group Morp (p <0.01); however, there was no difference between the groups in terms of RSS scores at the 12th, 16th, 20th and 24th hours (p> 0.05). There was no difference between the groups in terms of the frequency of side effects (p> 0.05). Conclusion: With regard to our study findings, dexmedetomidine can provide effective analgesia and sedation with shorter mechanical ventilation duration without adverse reaction compared to morphine in pediatric patients undergoing congenital cardiac surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTurkiye Klinikleri Journal of Anesthesiology ReanimationSame topicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207