Rashba band splitting in two-dimensional Ruddlesden–Popper halide perovskites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the presence of heavy elements and the dynamic nature of hybrid halide perovskites, the strong spin–orbit coupling effect can give rise to Rashba band splitting in these materials. Despite many reports on the Rashba effect in 3D perovskites like CH3NH3PbI3, little is known about its presence in two-dimensional Ruddlesden–Popper (2DRP) perovskites. In this work, we use first-principle calculations to investigate the magnitude and origin of the Rashba effect in three families of 2DRP perovskites. We demonstrate the correlation between the splitting magnitude and the octahedron distortions. Moreover, different numbers of inorganic layers, spacer cations, and A-site cations have a great influence on the Rashba splitting through different mechanisms. While structures with C6H5C2H4NH3 (PEA) have a significant Rashba splitting only in the monolayer condition, C4H9NH3 (BA) induces large distortion by tilting the CH3NH3 (MA) cations around all octahedrons, giving rise to a larger Rashba splitting with an increasing number of inorganic layers. Our work elucidates the magnitude and origin of the Rashba splitting in 2DRP perovskites and provides guidelines for the manipulation of the Rashba splitting in these materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".