MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Correlation of Hyperpolarised Xenon-129 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (129Xe-MRI) of the Lung with Multi-Breath Washout (MBW) in Children with Severe Asthma

2020· article· en· W3096215914 on OpenAlexaff
Shahideh Safavi, Brandon Zanette, Samal Munidasa, Elaine Stirrat, Daniel Li, Theo J. Moraes, Padmaja Subbarao, Giles Santyr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingWashoutXenonExhaled breath condensateLungNuclear magnetic resonanceAsthmaCardiologyRadiologyNuclear medicineInternal medicinePhysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<b>Introduction:</b> Asthma is the most common chronic disease in children. MBW-derived lung clearance index (LCI), a global measure of ventilation inhomogeneities, is increasingly used in paediatric patients to complement spirometry, the current gold-standard pulmonary function test. 129Xe-MRI, a functional imaging technique, can assess regional lung function, including regional ventilation inhomogeneities. A strong correlation between VDP and LCI in CF and a weaker one in mild asthma has been shown previously. <b>Aim:</b> We aimed to assess the feasibility of 129Xe-MRI in children with severe asthma. <b>Method:</b> 129Xe-MR lung images were acquired on a 3T Siemens MRI scanner during a breath-hold of up to 16-seconds. Images were analysed in MatLab, calculating the ventilation defect percentage (VDP) regionally. <b>Results:</b> Nine healthy children (mean age 10.6) and four with severe asthma (mean age 14.1) were recruited. All completed the scan. VDP was 15 times greater in the asthma cohort (p=0.02), in whom VDP correlated strongly with LCI (Pearson’s correlation r=0.99, p=0.018) and mildly with FEV1 (r=0.22). <b>Conclusion:</b> 129Xe-MRI is feasible in children with severe asthma and VDP correlates strongly with LCI. 129Xe-MRI is a non-ionising technique and may potentially be used as a biomarker to assess disease progression and therapeutic response. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02740868)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207