MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096233069 · doi:10.33021/jaaf.v4i2.1242

Quo Vadis Ekonomi Indonesia Pasca Covid-19

2020· article· en· W3096233069 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harris Turino Kurniawan, Adhi Setyo Santoso

Bibliographic record

VenueJAAF (Journal of Applied Accounting and Finance) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)RecessionCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)IndonesianStatus quoSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakEconomicsPolitical scienceDevelopment economicsEconomyEconomic historyGeographyMedicineMarket economyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Keynesian economicsVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CNN Indonesia, on 24 July 2020, reported that "BI predicted Indonesia to enter recession gap in the third quarter of 2020". Several online media immediately grabbed with the more bombastic article entitled, "Indonesia's economy is on the brink destruction." In the 2/2020 quarter, the conditions got worse. Singapore is a country the earliest reported 2/2020 quarter growth of - 41.2%, lowest throughout the history of the country's founding. Its annual growth becomes- 12.6% (yoy). Singapore's economy, which is supported by international trade and infrastructure, is under severe pressure. Malaysia hasn't reported its economic growth but is forecast to experience contraction amounted to 9.7%. Indonesia itself is also predicted to enter negative growth in 2/2020 quarter of - 3.8%. The question is whether the Indonesian economy is so bad? Indonesia's economic quo Vadis?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAAF (Journal of Applied Accounting and Finance)Same topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207