MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096294713 · doi:10.24193/subbphilo.2020.4.09

PARTICULAR FEATURES OF ISTRO-ROMANIAN PRONOMINAL CLITICS

2020· article· en· W3096294713 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adina Dragomirescu, Alexandru Nicolae

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Philologia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomanianCliticLinguisticsRomance languagesSyntaxSlavic languagesVerbHistoryDialectologyVariety (cybernetics)GeographyComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Particular Features of Istro-Romanian Pronominal Clitics. Istro-Romanian is a ‘historical dialect’ of Romanian, a severely endangered linguistic variety, spoken in the Istrian peninsula (Croatia) as an endogenous language, and in USA and Canada as an exogenous language. Using the data extracted from the available corpora, the paper offers a descriptive account of the main features of pronominal clitics in Istro-Romanian, focusing on empirical phenomena such as interpolation, verb(-auxiliary)-clitic inversion, (absence of) clitic climbing, and the position of clitics with respect to other elements of the verbal cluster. Some parallels with Croatian are also drawn, and the importance of old Romanian/old Romance inheritance is also briefly assessed. Future research will concentrate on more closely determining what plays a more important role in the syntax of Istro-Romanian: preservation of archaic Romanian/ Romance features or language contact? REZUMAT. Trăsături specifice ale pronumelor clitice în istroromână. Istroromâna este un „dialect istoric” al limbii române și reprezintă o varietate lingvistică pe cale de dispariție, vorbită în peninsula Istria (Croația) ca limbă endogenă, precum și în SUA și Canada ca limbă exogenă. Folosind date excerptate din corpusurile disponibile, lucrarea oferă o prezentare descriptivă a principalelor trăsături ale cliticelor pronominale în istroromână, concentrându-se asupra unor fenomene empirice precum: interpolarea, inversiunea verb(-auxiliar)-clitic, ridicarea cliticelor (sau absența acesteia) și poziția cliticelor în raport cu alte elemente din nucleul verbal. Se identifică paralele între istroromână și croată (limbă cu care istroromâna a fost în contact prelung și intens) și importanța elementelor moștenite din româna veche/fazele vechi ale limbilor romanice este pe scurt evidențiată. Cercetările viitoare se vor concentra asupra determinării cu mai mare exactitate a elementului care joacă un rol mai important în sintaxa istroromânei: prezervarea unor trăsături arhaice din româna veche/fazele vechi ale limbilor romanice sau contactul lingvistic? Cuvinte-cheie: istroromână, croată, româna veche, clitice pronominale, interpolare, inversiune, ridicarea cliticelor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai PhilologiaSame topicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and IdentityFrench-language works237,207