MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3096312888

Participation in everyday life of people with multiple sclerosis

2020· article· en· W3096312888 on OpenAlex
Maarit Karhula

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth, Politics, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEveryday lifeMultiple sclerosisPsychologyPolitical sciencePsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a progressive and unpredictable disease that presents sufferers with multifaceted challenges in participation in everyday life. The main purpose of this dissertation was twofold: first, to explore the participation and perceived functioning of moderately and severely disabled people with MS in everyday life, and second to investigate the effect of a two-year multidisciplinary rehabilitation on everyday activities. This dissertation is based on data from a multidisciplinary group rehabilitation project for people with MS (n=113). Additional data (n=89) collected to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA) questionnaire and predictors of participation using structural equation modelling (SEM). Participation and activities in everyday life were studied with the IPA questionnaire and the semi-structured interview Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), which are both self-assessment measures. The framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was applied in the analysis. Improvement in performance in daily activities of the people with moderate and severe MS during the two-year multidisciplinary group rehabilitation was investigated with the COPM using repeated measures of analysis of variance. The results showed that the IPA is a valid and reliable measure that captures the autonomy aspect of participation of people with MS. In addition, perceived problems in participation and activities in daily life of people with MS supported the ICF comprehensive and brief core sets for MS. The results of the SEM indicated that quality of life and the psychological and physical impacts of the disease were the main predictors of participation and autonomy. The two-year multidisciplinary group rehabilitation improved performance and satisfaction with daily activities of people with both moderate and severe MS. The most noteworthy self-reported reasons for change during rehabilitation program were personal and environmental factors. Overall, the findings highlight both the diversity of experiences of participation and activities in everyday life of people with MS and that these experiences are not explained by disease severity. Therefore, self-assessment measures are recommended for measuring participation and activities in everyday life of people with MS. Moreover, the findings suggest that changes in performance and satisfaction in daily activities require long-term multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it