Prognostic and clinical significance of long non-coding RNA SNHG12 expression in various cancers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, increasing studies suggested that lncRNA SNHG12 was aberrantly expressed in kinds of cancers. However, definite prognostic value of SNHG12 remains unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the association between SNHG12 expression level and cancer prognosis. A literature retrieval was conducted by searching kinds of databases. The meta-analysis was performed by using Revman 5.2 and Stata 12.0 software. Besides, The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset was analyzed to validate the results in our meta-analysis via using Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis. The pooled results showed that high SNHG12 expression significantly indicated worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Tumor type, sample size, survival analysis method, and cutoff value did not alter SNHG12 prognosis value according to stratified analysis results. Additionally, higher expression of SNHG12 suggested unfavorable clinicopathological outcomes including larger tumor size, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and advanced clinical stage. Online cross-validation in TCGA dataset further indicated that cancer patients with upregulated SNHG12 expression had worse overall survival and disease-free survival. Therefore, elevated SNHG12 expression was associated with poor survival and unfavorable clinical outcomes in various cancers, and therefore might be a potential prognostic biomarker in human cancers.Abbreviations Akt: protein kinase B; CESC: cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma; ceRNA: competitive endogenous RNA; CNKI: China National Knowledge Infrastructure; CI: confidence interval; CCNE1: cyclin E1; COAD: colon adenocarcinoma; DM: distant metastasis; DFS: disease-free survival; EMT: epithelial–mesenchymal transition; FISH: fluorescence in situ hybridization; FIGO: the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; GEPIA: Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis; HR: hazard ratio; HIFα: hypoxia-inducible factor 1 α; KIRC: kidney renal clear cell carcinoma; KIRP: kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma; LIHC: hepatocellular carcinoma; LNM: lymph node metastasis; mTOR: mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase; MMP-9: matrix metalloproteinase 9; MCL1: myeloid cell leukemia 1; MLK3: mixed-lineage protein kinase 3; N/A: not available; NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; OR: odd ratio; OS: overall survival; PSA: prostate-specific antigen; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; qRT-PCR: quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; READ: rectum adenocarcinoma; RFS: recurrence-free survival; SARC: sarcoma; SNHG12: small nucleolar RNA host gene 12; STAT3: signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; SOX4: SRY-box transcription factor 4; SOX5: SRY-box transcription factor 5; STAD: stomach adenocarcinoma; TCGA: The Cancer Genome Atlas; TNM: tumor node metastasis; WWP1: WW domain-containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1; WHO grade: World Health Organization grade; ZEB2: zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".