<i>Codium</i>-like taxa from the Silurian of North America: morphology, taxonomy, paleoecology, and phylogenetic affinity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A 1901 report by the Smithsonian Custodian of Paleozoic Plants noted that the nonbiomineralized taxaButhotrephis divaricataWhite, 1901,B. newliniWhite, 1901, andB. lesquereuxiGrote and Pitt, 1876, from the upper Silurian of the Great Lakes area, shared key characteristics in common with the extant green macroalgaCodium. A detailed reexamination of theseCodium-like taxa and similar forms from the lower Silurian of Ontario, New York, and Michigan, including newly collected material ofThalassocystis striataTaggart and Parker, 1976, aided by scanning electron microscopy and stable carbon isotope analysis, provides new data in support of an algal affinity. Crucially, as withCodium, the originally cylindrical axes of all of these taxa consist of a complex internal array of tubes divided into distinct medullary and cortical regions, the medullary tubes being arranged in a manner similar to those of livingPseudocodium. In view of these findings, the three study taxa originally assigned toButhotrephis, together withChondrites verusRuedemann, 1925, are transferred to the new algal taxonInocladusnew genus, thereby establishingInocladus lesquereuxinew combination,Inocladus newlininew comb.,Inocladus divaricatanew comb., andInocladus verusnew comb. Morphological and paleoecological data point to a phylogenetic affinity forInocladusn. gen. andThalassocystiswithin theCodium-bearing green algal order Bryopsidales, but perhaps nested within an extinct lineage. Collectively, this material fits within a large-scale pattern of major macroalgal morphological diversification initiated in concert with the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event and apparently driven by a marked escalation in grazing pressure. UUID: http://zoobank.org/97c5c737-b291-41a2-aceb-f398cac9537a
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".