Condition-Transforming Variational Autoencoder for Generating Diverse Short Text Conversations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, conditional-transforming variational autoencoders (CTVAEs) are proposed for generating diverse short text conversations. In conditional variational autoencoders (CVAEs), the prior distribution of latent variable z follows a multivariate Gaussian distribution with mean and variance modulated by the input conditions. Previous work found that this distribution tended to become condition-independent in practical applications. Thus, this article designs CTVAEs to enhance the influence of conditions in CVAEs. In a CTVAE model, the latent variable z is sampled by performing a non-linear transformation on the combination of the input conditions and the samples from a condition-independent prior distribution N (0, I). In our experiments using a Chinese Sina Weibo dataset, the CTVAE model derives z samples for decoding with better condition-dependency than that of the CVAE model. The earth mover’s distance (EMD) between the distributions of the latent variable z at the training stage, and the testing stage is also reduced by using the CTVAE model. In subjective preference tests, our proposed CTVAE model performs significantly better than CVAE and sequence-to-sequence (Seq2Seq) models on generating diverse, informative, and topic-relevant responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it