MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Visualizing Cellular Adaptations during Ozone‐induced Lung Inflammation

2019· article· en· W3096942319 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gurpreet Kaur Aulakh, Jaswant Singh, Elizabeth Snead

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLungAlveolar macrophageImmunologyBronchoalveolar lavageInflammationMacrophagePopulationPathologyMedicineChemistryInternal medicineIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ozone (O 3 ) is a prevalent environmental pollutant with well‐documented acute and chronic health effects. Neutrophils are known as the prime orchestrators of lung immune surveillance. Although bacterial infections are known to elicit a robust lung neutrophil and alveolar macrophage response, it is not known why and how neutrophils are activated in response to sterile lung injury. Acute exposures to 2 ppm O 3 induce lung macrophage and neutrophil extravasation and airway hyper‐reactivity at 24 h, however, these concentrations are manifold higher than ambient O 3 concentrations, thus precluding any understanding of the initial events. Our pilot experiments established ozone's dose and time dependent killing of alveolar macrophages and concomitant recruitment of leukocytes. Our data indicated that 50 ppb of O 3 induces cell death in half of the lung alveolar macrophage population. Thereafter, we exposed C57BL6 mice to either filtered air or 50 ppb of O 3 for 2 h to understand the kinetics of murine ozone induced acute lung injury. We report acute vascular neutrophil concentration and activation at as early as 2 h post exposure which continues up to 24 h after ozone exposure. Immunofluorescent staining revealed CD11b positive lung alveolar macrophage and neutrophil recruitment. In addition to conventional bronchoalveolar lavage, lung vascular perfusate and peripheral blood analysis, we present novel application of simple, yet powerful, configuration of a fixed‐stage wide‐field upright fluorescent intravital microscopic set‐up to investigate ozone's oxidative lung damage. We observed extensive alveolar actin filament disorganization (Fig. 1), an initial drop (at 2 h post‐O 3 exposure) followed by restoration (18 h post‐O 3 exposure) of alveolar reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Fig. 2) as well as mitochondrial potential (Fig. 3) in live animals. Important findings from these preliminary experiments include CD11b predominant phenotypes of pulmonary leukocytes, alveolar necrosis, actin disorganization, acute alterations in alveolar ROS production as well as mitochondrial potential. Thus, we present evidence of systemic as well as lung toxicity at 40 fold lower O 3 concentrations. The findings are important in establishing a sensitive model of ozone induced acute lung injury. Support or Funding Information Fedoruk Centre and Innovation Saskatchewan. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→