Former à et par la recherche : description d’un dispositif de formation basé sur la collaboration entre étudiants d’Université et de Haute-Ecole
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à présenter et discuter un dispositif de collaboration mis en œuvre dans le cadre de la formation de futurs masterisés en Sciences de l’éducation à l’Université et de futurs instituteurs préscolaires à la Haute-Ecole. Pour cette recherche, les formateurs des deux institutions proposent aux étudiants des deux cursus de collaborer dans le processus de création et d’évaluation de séquences d’enseignement-apprentissage en éveil géographique. Par le biais d'une succession d'analyses au moyen d’une grille d’analyse critériée, huit séquences développant la compétence «Utiliser des repères spatiaux» ont pu être conçues, adaptées et validées par des étudiants en formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".