MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Heterogeneous Numerical Modelling for the Autothermal Reforming of Synthetic Crude Glycerol in a Fixed Bed Reactor

2020· dataset· en· W3097186951 on OpenAlexaff
Jason Williams, Hussameldin Ibrahim, Nima Karimi, Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng

Bibliographic record

VenueAuthorea · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCatalysis for Biomass Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethane reformerYield (engineering)GlycerolCatalysisSpace velocityThermodynamicsMaterials scienceChemistryKinetic energyReaction rateChemical engineeringMechanicsSteam reformingPhysicsOrganic chemistrySelectivityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a numerical reactor model for the catalytic autothermal reforming (ATR) reaction of crude glycerol in fixed bed tubular reactor over an in-house developed metal oxide catalyst. The heterogeneous model accounts for a two-phase system of solid catalyst and bulk feed gas developed using finite element method. The reaction scheme and intrinsic kinetic rate model over an active, selective, and stable catalyst were integrated in the developed model. The model was validated using experimental data. The modelling results adequately described the detailed gas product composition and distribution, temperature profiles, and conversion propagation in axial direction of the fixed bed reactor over a wide range of reaction temperature and hourly space velocity. The crude glycerol conversion predicted with the model showing close resemblance to those obtained experimentally with an average absolute deviation of 8%. The maximum conversion and yield were 92% and 3 mol. H2/mol. crude glycerol, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAuthoreaSame topicCatalysis for Biomass ConversionFrench-language works237,207