MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097205024 · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000001631

Radial Nerve Compression Secondary to Orthopedic Fixation Plate for Humeral Shaft Fracture: Iatrogenic Double Crush Syndrome

2020· article· en· W3097205024 on OpenAlexaff
Mylène Mazerolle, Johan Michaud, Mathieu Boudier‐Revéret

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadial nerveInternal fixationAnatomyHumerusOrthopedic surgerySurgeryReduction (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 24-yr-old woman presented with a left distal humeral shaft fracture after sustaining a fall while snowboarding (Fig. 1A). An open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) including medial and lateral plates was performed 5 days later with no reported complications (Fig. 1B). Upon cast removal 15 days after ORIF, the patient presented with hypoesthesia of the first interdigital space with complete weakness of wrist extension and finger extension, suggesting radial nerve injury. An ultrasound examination was performed to evaluate radial nerve continuity. Ultrasound showed compression of the radial nerve by the surgical material in two locations (Fig. 1C). Based on those findings, a second intervention was performed to remove part of the plate compressing the nerve and the screw that was impaling that same nerve more distally (Fig. 1D). On follow-up approximately 3 months later, the patient had significant recovery of motor response. A second ultrasound examination was done to confirm the resolution of radial nerve conflict with ORIF material (Fig. 1E).FIGURE 1: Initial anteroposterior radiograph showing displaced comminuted fracture of the distal left humerus (A). Post–open reduction internal fixation anteroposterior radiograph showing plates and screws’ location (B). Initial ultrasound showing edema of the radial nerve, with compression between the lateral plate and the humeral shaft on approximately 3 cm in length. There is also a second radial nerve injury caused by a screw from the medial plate going directly through the nerve (C). Postrevision oblique radiograph showing part of the lateral and medial plates that have been removed with removal of proximal screws from both plates (D). Postrevision ultrasound showing no more compression of the radial nerve by the plate and no more impalement of the radial nerve by a screw. As expected, there are some significant changes in the caliber of the nerve (E).Secondary radial nerve palsy after ORIF for humeral shaft fracture can be present in up to 12.2% according to a recent study from Streufert et al.1 involving 261 patients. A recent study of feasibility by Liechti et al.2 (2019) concluded that postoperative ultrasound after humeral shaft fracture ORIF is feasible and reliable to evaluate radial nerve continuity. Cartwright et al.3 (2007) were able to demonstrate a sensitivity of 89% and a sensitivity of 95% in the diagnosis of nerve transection with ultrasound. This vignette supports the idea that ultrasound is a noninvasive technique to evaluate secondary nerve palsy in humeral shaft fracture after ORIF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationSame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207