MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3097211158 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-136980

Early Pharmacodynamic Changes in T-Cell Activation, Proliferation, and Cytokine Production Confirm the Mode of Action of BFCR4350A, a FcRH5/CD3 T-Cell-Engaging Bispecific Antibody, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2020· article· en· W3097211158 on OpenAlexaff
Rin Nakamura, Sean Lear, Deanna Wilson, Hartmut Koeppen, Anjali Vaze, Suzanne Trudel, Andrew Spencer, Simon J. Harrison, Adam D. Cohen, Bernard M. Fine, Mengsong Li, James Cooper, Teiko Sumiyoshi

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacodynamicsMedicineAldesleukinCytokineRefractory (planetary science)AntibodyBispecific antibodyCD3Cytokine release syndromeImmunologyT cellInterleukin 2Internal medicineCancer researchPharmacologyImmune systemBiologyPharmacokineticsMonoclonal antibodyCD8

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Fc receptor-homolog 5 (FcRH5) is an immunoglobulin (Ig) domain-containing type I membrane protein that is expressed exclusively in the B-cell lineage. FcRH5 expression is retained in myeloma cells, with near 100% prevalence, and is elevated vs normal B cells. BFCR4350A is a humanized IgG-based T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody. Binding of BFCR4350A to the most membrane-proximal domain of FcRH5 on myeloma cells and to cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) on T cells results in efficient immunological synapse formation and potent T-cell-directed killing of myeloma cells (Li, et al. Cancer Cell 2017). An ongoing Phase I dose-escalation study (GO39775; NCT03275103) is investigating the safety, activity, pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics of BFCR4350A monotherapy in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). In Arm A, clinical activity was observed at the 3.6mg/20mg (step/target) dose level and above, and toxicity was manageable (Cohen, et al. ASH 2020). We present preliminary biomarker data that demonstrate the mode of action (MOA) of BFCR4350A, provide support for Cycle (C) 1 step-up dosing, and offer preliminary insights into markers that may predict response. Methods: In Arm A, R/R MM pts receive BFCR4350A by intravenous infusion in 21-day cycles. In C1, a single step-up dosing approach is used to mitigate the risk for cytokine release syndrome (CRS), with the step dose given on C1 Day (D) 1 and the target dose given on C1D8. The target dose is then administered on D1 of each subsequent cycle. PD changes in peripheral blood (PB) are assessed at baseline and at multiple time points within C1 by whole blood flow cytometry, plasma cytokine electrochemiluminescence and digital ELISA. Tumor biomarkers are assessed at baseline and pre-C2 by bone marrow (BM) biopsy dual CD138/CD8 immunohistochemistry staining and BM aspirate flow cytometry. The clinical cut-off date used for the current analyses was April 13, 2020. Results: At cut-off, all pts in Arm A (n=51) were biomarker evaluable. FcRH5 expression on myeloma cells was detected in all pts. Dose-dependent PD changes in PB were observed 24-192 hrs after the C1D1 infusion. Variable reduction in circulating T cells was observed 24 hrs after the 0.3-1.8mg C1D1 doses, while consistent reduction was observed after the 3.6mg C1D1 dose, with recovery by C1D8 (192 hrs). T-cell activation was detected 24 hrs post-infusion by upregulation of CD69 in CD8 and CD4 T cells and elevation of IFN-γ in plasma (median increase of ~150-fold from baseline), while T-cell proliferation (Ki67+) peaked by C1D8. At the 3.6mg C1D1 dose, CD8 T-cell activation and proliferation were up to 20-fold higher than at baseline. Minimal elevation of IL-6 was observed post-infusion in pts who received doses below 3.6mg on C1D1, while more consistent increases (≥100pg/ml) were observed in pts who received 3.6mg. IL-6 levels peaked within 24 hrs of the C1D1 dose and the kinetics of IL-6 increase were associated with dose and risk for CRS. Step-up dosing mitigated the risk for severe CRS, as evidenced by lower IL-6 levels after the C1D8 target dose compared to the 3.6mg C1D1 step dose in 27/33 (82%) pts (see Cohen, et al. ASH 2020 for corresponding clinical data). Preliminary data suggest that pts who respond to BFCR4350A have more pronounced T-cell expansion in PB, irrespective of baseline CD8 T-cell levels during the first week of C1. Analysis of the subset of pts with paired BM biopsies (n=19 pts) revealed that levels of CD8+ tumor infiltrating T-cells (TILs) were higher in responding pts than in non-responding pts at the end of C1. Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrated that early PD changes in T-cell activation, proliferation, and cytokine production confirm the MOA of BFCR4350A and support C1 step-up dosing for CRS mitigation in R/R MM. Early data suggest that at the end of C1, higher peripheral CD8 T-cell expansion and TILs are observed in responding pts than in non-responding pts. Additional analyses are ongoing to establish BFCR4350A response predictors and to better characterize the populations that are likely to benefit. Updated data will be presented. Disclosures Nakamura: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lear:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment. Wilson:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment. Koeppen:Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Pliant Therapeutics, Allogene, Jounce: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vaze:Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Trudel:Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Spencer:Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Servier and Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Honoraria; AbbVie, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene, Janssen and Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Harrison:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Haemalogix: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cohen:Novartis: Other: Patents/Intellectual property licensed, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fine:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Li:Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. Cooper:Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sumiyoshi:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. OffLabel Disclosure: BFCR4350A is a humanized IgG-based T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody that targets the most membrane-proximal domain of FcRH5 on myeloma cells and CD3 on T cells. Dual binding facilitates efficient immunological synapse formation, resulting in T-cell activation and killing of myeloma cells. BFCR4350A is an investigational agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→