New high precision U-Pb ages and Hf isotope data from the Karoo large igneous province; implications for pulsed magmatism and early Toarcian environmental perturbations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To better constrain the age and duration of the magmatism associated with the Karoo large igneous province (LIP), we present new U-Pb ID-TIMS dates and εHf values from baddeleyite and zircon grains from Karoo basin mafic sills and from felsic samples from the Lebombo and Mwenezi monoclines, together with an 40Ar/39Ar age database of Karoo rocks that has been filtered for true plateau ages with >70% of 39Ar released and in which all 40Ar/39Ar ages were recalculated using the current best estimates for the decay constants. Zircon and baddeleyite ages from three Karoo basin sills range from 183.36 ± 0.17/0.27 to 183.06 ± 0.07/0.21 Ma, where the two uncertainties reflect the analytical error and the additional error associated with decay constant uncertainty. Zircon from the Mutandawhe pluton are dated to 176.84 ± 0.06/0.20 Ma, which represents the first high-precision U-Pb age of the late stage Karoo-LIP magmatism in the northern Lebombo-Mwenezi region. Initial hafnium isotopes are close to chondritic for the Karoo basin and central Lebombo samples (εHf from −2 to +3), but more negative for zircon grains from the Mutandawhe pluton (−11.3 ± 1.1, 2SD). In combination with previous studies and in agreement with the updated 40Ar/39Ar ages, we show that the sill complex that intruded the Karoo basin was short-lived at ~320 ± 180 ka and that it pre-dated the magmatism of the Ferrar-LIP by around 460 ka, whereas the entire Karoo-LIP was emplaced over a period of ca. 6.5 Ma. Based on high-precision U-Pb geochronology, Karoo-LIP magmatism occurred after 183.36 ± 0.17 Ma and therefore postdated the extinction pulses of the late Pliensbachian and likely the Pliensbachian-Toarcian boundary. However, we support previous conclusions that the start of the Karoo-LIP activity agrees with the onset of the Toarcian oceanic anoxic event and the early Toarcian warming, indicating that these environmental changes were likely a response to the magmatic activity of the Karoo-LIP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".