CMB lensing power spectrum estimation without instrument noise bias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The power spectrum of cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing will be measured to sub-percent precision with upcoming surveys, enabling tight constraints on the sum of neutrino masses and other cosmological parameters. Measuring the lensing power spectrum involves the estimation of the connected trispectrum of the four-point function of the CMB map, which requires the subtraction of a large Gaussian disconnected noise bias. This reconstruction noise bias receives contributions both from CMB and foreground fluctuations as well as instrument noise (both detector and atmospheric noise for ground-based surveys). The debiasing procedure therefore relies on the quality of simulations of the instrument noise which may be expensive or inaccurate. We propose a new estimator that makes use of at least four splits of the CMB maps with independent instrument noise. This estimator makes the CMB lensing power spectrum completely insensitive to any assumptions made in modeling or simulating the instrument noise. We show that this estimator, in many practical situations, leads to no substantial loss in signal-to-noise. We provide an efficient algorithm for its computation that scales with the number of splits m as 𝒪(m 2 ) as opposed to a naive 𝒪(m 4 ) expectation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".