MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097573786 · doi:10.1097/fjc.0000000000000926

Agrin Yes-associated Protein Promotes the Proliferation of Epicardial Cells

2020· article· en· W3097573786 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaodong Jing, Bin Liu, Songbai Deng, Jianlin Du, Qiang She

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
Canadian institutionsOffice of the Chief Medical Examiner
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgrinFlow cytometryCell biologyBiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyChemistryMolecular biologyMedicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Embryonic epicardial cells make an important contribution to cardiac development. However, their proliferation mechanism is still unclear. Epicardial cells from E12.5 fetal hearts were used in our study. Agrin was used to treat these cells. The expression of Aurora B, Ki67, and pH3 was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence. The proportion of cells in G1/S/G2 phase was determined by flow cytometry. The results showed that agrin significantly increased the expression of ki67, pH3, and Aurora B in epicardial cells. Flow cytometry results showed that agrin significantly increased the proportion of epicardial cells in S phase. However, blocking yes-associated protein significantly downregulated the levels of ki67, pH3, and Aurora B and the proportion of epicardial cells in S phase. Thus, our results suggest that agrin may promote the proliferation of epicardial cells by regulating the yes-associated protein activity. This may be useful in exploring heart development mechanisms and preventing congenital heart disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular PharmacologySame topicHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZFrench-language works237,207