Bibliographic record
Abstract
J. M. Barrie’s novel Peter and Wendy (1911) reflects the dicourse over boyhood and boyishness presented in English boarding school narratives. In nineteenth-century English society, boyhood was closely associated with the national agenda for the imperial expansion. The figure of the boy who would not grow up was idealized as the empire replaced its vision of the mature nation with that of the nation that maintains boyish energy. By borrowing the literary conventions of boys’ boarding school narratives, Peter and Wendy both represents and questions the ideal of perpetual boyhood. On the one hand, Neverland, the setting of the novel, betrays Lost Boys’ desire to challenge the dominant discourse that glorifies growing up. On the other hand, the impossibility of remaining as boys for ever is presented through the Old Boy figure that plays a make-believe play both in Peter and Wendy and in English boarding school narratives. Through contrasting Peter Pan with Captain Hook, the Old Boy, Barrie suggests that the boarding school system led the empire’s male subjects to cling to their memories of boyhood and that boyish men’s obsession with endless play/game became the cause of innumerable deaths/losses during the wartime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.072 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".