MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097700834 · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a6861

Cortical Distribution of Fragile Periventricular Anastomotic Collateral Vessels in Moyamoya Disease: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study of Japanese Patients with Moyamoya Disease

2020· article· en· W3097700834 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Akinori Miyakoshi, Takeshi Funaki, Yasutaka Fushimi, Takuro Nakae, Masakazu Okawa, Takayuki Kikuchi, Hiroharu Kataoka, Kazumichi Yoshida, Yohei Mineharu, Masao Matsuhashi, Eiji Nakatani, Susumu Miyamoto

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMoyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoyamoya diseaseMedicineAnastomosisCortex (anatomy)AnatomyCollateral circulationSulcusInsular cortexMiddle cerebral arteryCerebral cortexRadiologyCentral sulcusSurgeryMotor cortexIschemiaCardiologyInternal medicineBiologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:</h3> Collateral vessels in Moyamoya disease represent potential sources of bleeding. To test whether these cortical distributions vary among subtypes, we investigated cortical terminations using both standardized MR imaging and MRA. <h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS:</h3> Patients with Moyamoya disease who underwent MR imaging with MRA in our institution were enrolled in this study. MRA was spatially normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute space; then, collateral vessels were measured on MRA and classified into 3 types of anastomosis according to the parent artery: lenticulostriate, thalamic, and choroidal. We also obtained the coordinates of collateral vessel outflow to the cortex. Differences in cortical terminations were compared among the 3 types of anastomosis. <h3>RESULTS:</h3> We investigated 219 patients with Moyamoya disease, and a total of 190 collateral vessels (lenticulostriate anastomosis, <i>n</i> = 72; thalamic anastomosis, <i>n</i> = 21; choroidal anastomosis, <i>n</i> = 97) in 46 patients met the inclusion criteria. We classified the distribution patterns of collateral anastomosis as follows: lenticulostriate collaterals outflowing anteriorly (<i>P </i>&lt; .001; 95% CI, 67.0–87.0) and medially (<i>P </i>&lt; .001; 95% CI, 11.0–24.0) more frequently than choroidal collaterals; lenticulostriate collaterals outflowing anteriorly more frequently than thalamic collaterals (<i>P </i>&lt; .001; 95% CI, 34.0–68.0); and choroidal collaterals outflowing posteriorly more frequently than thalamic collaterals (<i>P </i>&lt; .001; 95% CI, 14.0–34.0). Lenticulostriate anastomoses outflowed to the superior or inferior frontal sulcus and interhemispheric fissure. Thalamic anastomoses outflowed to the insular cortex and cortex around the central sulcus. Choroidal anastomoses outflowed to the cortex posterior to the central sulcus and the insular cortex. <h3>CONCLUSIONS:</h3> Cortical distribution patterns appear to differ markedly among the 3 types of collaterals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NeuroradiologySame topicMoyamoya disease diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207