Coating Flow Near Channel Exit. A Theoretical Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The planar flow of a steady moving-wall free-surface jet is examined theoretically for moderate inertia and surface tension. The method of matched asymptotic expansion and singular perturbation is used to explore the rich dynamics near the stress singularity. A thin-film approach is also proposed to capture the flow further downstream where the flow becomes of the boundary-layer type. We exploit the similarity character of the flow to circumvent the presence of the singularity. The study is of close relevance to slot and blade coating. The jet is found to always contract near the channel exit, but presents a mild expansion further downstream for a thick coating film. We predict that separation occurs upstream of the exit for slot coating, essentially for any coating thickness near the moving substrate, and for a thin film near the die. For capillary number of order one, the jet profile is not affected by surface tension but the normal stress along the free surface exhibits a maximum that strengthens with surface tension. In contrast to existing numerical findings, we predict the existence of upstream influence as indicated by the nonlinear pressure dependence on upstream distance and the pressure undershoot (overshoot) in blade (slot) coating at the exit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".