MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097773635 · doi:10.1142/s0217984920300082

Superconductivity in crystals with spin-orbit coupling

2020· article· en· W3097773635 on OpenAlex
K. V. Samokhin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters B · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicIron-based superconductors research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPairingPhysicsDegenerate energy levelsSuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsSymmetry (geometry)Wave functionParity (physics)Bloch waveQuantum mechanicsRotational symmetryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electron Bloch states in crystals with spin-orbit coupling do not always transform under symmetry operations in the same way as the pure spin-1/2 states. This has profound consequences for the gap symmetry and nodal structure of superconductors. Based on the generalization of the Ueda–Rice prescription for the Bloch bases in twofold degenerate bands, we develop the general symmetry classification of multi-band superconducting pairing in non-magnetic centrosymmetric crystals. For the intraband pairing, we identify four exceptional cases in which the triplet gap function does not transform under the point group operations as a pseudovector, with a significant impact on the nodal structure. For the interband pairing, we show that the conventional ([Formula: see text]-wave) gap functions can have such unconventional features as triplet components and odd parity. The [Formula: see text]-wave interband pairing can also be odd in momentum and have a triplet component.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it