Developmental Single-cell transcriptomics in the <i>Lytechinus variegatus</i> Sea Urchin Embryo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Here we employed scRNA-seq coupled with computational approaches to examine molecular changes in cells during specification and differentiation. We examined the first 24 hours of development of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus ( Lv ) with 18 time points during which the embryo develops to the larval stage. Using Waddington-OT, the time points were computationally “stitched” together to calculate developmental trajectories. Skeletogenic cells displayed the expected immediate early divergence while other lineages diverged asynchronously, with many cells retaining an intermediate specification status until late in gastrulation. The Lv -scRNA-seq dataset was compared to the developmental Gene Regulatory Network (dGRN) model of specification in Strongylocentrotus purpuratus ( Sp ). 79 of 80 genes (98%) in that dGRN are present in the Lv -scRNA-seq dataset, and expressed in the correct lineages in which the dGRN circuits operate. Surprisingly, however, many heterochronies in timing of first expression of dGRN genes have evolved between the two species. Replotting the two dGRNs with precise attention to time of expression revealed a number of feedback inputs that likely buffer the dGRNs, allowing them to maintain function in the face of accumulating heterochronies. Summary statement The early development of the sea urchin embryo was followed using scRNA-seq plus computational methods to trace lineage diversifications. These were matched to gene regulatory network changes over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".