Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alkene metathesis has been extended to increasingly complex starting materials and products. Nitriles are good donors to coordinatively-unsaturated transition metal centers, so tend to inhibit the reaction. Ren He of Dalian University of Technology has found (Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 4203) that inclusion of the loosely-coordinating 2-methyl pyridine in the reaction enables facile cross-coupling with acrylonitrile 2. Although crosscoupling with (Z, Z)-sorbate is not efficient, Dennis P. Curran of the University of Pittsburgh has shown (Organic Lett. 2007, 9, 5) that cross-coupling with (E, Z)-sorbate 5 works well. For large scale work, he has developed a Hoveyda-type catalyst with a perfluoro tail, that is recoverable in 70% recrystallized yield from the reaction mixture. Shigefumi Kuwahara of Tohoku University has reported (Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 3163) a practical alternative for direct metathesis to deliver (E, E)-dienyl esters. Continuing the investigation of tandem Ru-catalyzed reactions, Marc L. Snapper of Boston College effected (Organic Lett. 2007, 9, 1749) metathesis with methacrolein 8a, then added Ph3P and diazoacetate, to give the diene 11. A range of common Ru catalysts worked well for this transformation. In an alternative approach to trisubstituted alkene construction, Stellios Arseniyadis and Janine Cossy of ESPCI Paris have demonstrated (Organic Lett. 2007, 9, 1695) that inclusion of Cl-catecholborane 14 allows clean cross metathesis with the lactone 13. The construction of tetrasubstituted alkenes has been more challenging. Yann Schrodi of Materia, Inc. (Organic Lett. 2007, 9, 1589) has described a catalyst 17 that is particularly effective. Complex 17 was superior to a catalyst reported (Organic Lett. 2007, 9, 1339) shortly earlier by Robert H. Grubbs of Caltech. Debendra K. Mohapatra of the National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, and Professor Grubbs, in a new approach to macrocyclic stereocontrol, have made (Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 2621) the remarkable observation that the cyclization of the bis ether 19a gave 20 in a 9:1 E / Z ratio, while cyclization of the diol 9b gave only Z - 21. Oligomer formation can often compete in such medium ring-forming reactions. Deryn E. Fogg of the University of Ottawa has raised (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1024) the cautionary (but happy!) observation that while the cyclization, for instance, of 22 proceeded efficiently to give 23, at an intermediate point in the transformation the product was more than half oligomer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".