MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3098269198

NLTE for APOGEE: Simultaneous Multi-Element NLTE Radiative
\nTransfer

2020· article· en· W3098269198 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Y. Osorio

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratorySmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryDirektoratet for UtviklingssamarbeidUniversity of Colorado BoulderInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonJohns Hopkins UniversityUppsala UniversitetUniversity of OxfordYork UniversityUniversität WienLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Notre DameCarnegie Mellon UniversityNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalCarnegie Institution of WashingtonUniversity of UtahOhio State UniversityU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthVanderbilt UniversityNational Research, Development and Innovation OfficeYale UniversityMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsOpacityStarsPhysicsAstrophysicsRadiative transferStellar atmosphereHeavy elementRadiative equilibriumThermodynamic equilibriumThermodynamicsOptics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Relaxing the assumption of local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) in modelling stellar spectra is a necessary step to determine chemical abundances to better than about 10% in late-type stars. Aims. We describe our multi-element (Na, Mg, K, and Ca) non-LTE (NLTE) calculations, which can be applied to the APOGEE survey. Methods. The new version of TLUSTY allows for the calculation of restricted NLTE in cool stars using pre-calculated opacity tables. We demonstrate that TLUSTY gives consistent results with MULTI, a well-tested code for NLTE in cool stars. We used TLUSTY to perform LTE and a series of NLTE calculations that simultaneously used all combinations of one, two, three and four of the elements in NLTE. Results. We take into account that departures from LTE in one element can affect others through changes in the opacities of Na, Mg, K, and Ca. We find that atomic Mg, which provides strong UV opacity and exhibits significant departures from LTE in the low-energy states, can affect the NLTE populations of Ca, leading to abundance corrections as large as 0.07 dex. The differences in the derived abundances between the single-element and the multi-element cases can exceed those between the single-element NLTE determinations and an LTE analysis. We therefore caution that this is not always a second-order effect. Based on detailed tests for three stars with reliable atmospheric parameters (Arcturus, Procyon, and the Sun), we conclude that our NLTE calculations provide abundance corrections that can in the optical amount to 0.1, 0.2, and 0.7 dex for Ca, Na and K, but LTE is a good approximation for Mg. In the H-band, NLTE corrections are much smaller and always lower than 0.1 dex. The derived NLTE abundances in the optical and in the IR are consistent. In all three stars, NLTE line profiles fit the observations better than the LTE counterparts for all four elements. Conclusions. The atomic elements in ionisation stages where over-ionisation is an important NLTE mechanism are likely affected by departures from LTE in Mg. Particular care must be taken with the collisions that are adopted for high-lying levels when NLTE profiles of lines in the H-band are calculated. The derived NLTE corrections in the optical and in the H-band differ, but the derived NLTE abundances are consistent between the two spectral regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences)Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207