MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3098919339 · doi:10.3390/s20226648

A Study of the Radiation Tolerance of CVD Diamond to 70 MeV Protons, Fast Neutrons and 200 MeV Pions

2020· article· en· W3098919339 on OpenAlexaff
L. Bäni, Andreas V. Alexopoulos, M. Artuso, Felix Bachmair, M. Bartosik, Helge Christoph Beck, Vincenzo Bellini, V. Belyaev, B. Bentele, A. Bès, Jean-Marie Brom, G. Chiodini, D. Chren, V. Cindro, G. Claus, Johann Collot, J. P. Cumalat, S. Curtoni, Anne Dabrowski, R. D’Alessandro, D. Dauvergne, W. De Boer, Christian Dorfer, Marc Dünser, G. Eigen, V. Eremin, J. Forneris, L. Gallin-Martel, M.-L. Gallin-Martel, Kock Gan, M. Gastal, A. Ghimouz, M. Goffe, J. Goldstein, А. А. Голубев, A. Gorišek, E. Grigoriev, J. Große-Knetter, A. Grummer, B. Hiti, Dmitry Hits, M. R. Hoeferkamp, J. Hosselet, Chris Hutson, J. Janssen, H. Kagan, K. Kanxheri, Richard Kass, M. Kiš, G. Kramberger, Sergey Kuleshov, A. Lacoste, S. Lagomarsino, Alessandro Lo Giudice, I. López Paz, Eric Lukosi, C. Maazouzi, I. Mandić, S Marcatili, A. D. Marino, Cédric Mathieu, M. Menichelli, M. Mikuž, A. Morozzi, F. Moscatelli, R. Mountain, A. Oh, P. Olivero, D. Passeri, H. Pernegger, R. Perrino, Federico Picollo, M. Pomorski, Renato Potenza, Arnulf Quadt, F. Rarbi, Alessandro Re, M. Reichmann, S. Roe, O. Rossetto, D. A. Sanz Becerra, C. Schmidt, Stephen Schnetzer, S. Sciortino, A. Scorzoni, S. Seidel, L. Servoli, Dale Smith, Bruno Sopko, Vit Sopko, S. Spagnolo, Stefan Spanier, Kevin Stenson, R. Stone, B. Stugu, C. Sutera, M. Traeger, W. Trischuk, Marco Truccato, C. Tuvé, J. J. Velthuis, Stephen Wagner, R. Wallny, Jianchun Wang, N. Wermes, J.S.T. Wickramasinghe, M. Yamouni, Justas Zalieckas, Marko Zavrtanik, K. Hara, Y. Ikegami, O. Jinnouchi, Takashi Kohriki, Shingo Mitsui, R. Nagai, S. Terada, Y. Unno

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
FundersEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEuropean CommissionCERNSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungU.S. Department of EnergyHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeInstitut "Jožef Stefan"National Science Foundation
KeywordsPionIrradiationNeutronNuclear physicsPhysicsDiamondFluenceRadiation damageHadronNeutron temperatureElectronAtomic physicsMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We measured the radiation tolerance of commercially available diamonds grown by the Chemical Vapor Deposition process by measuring the charge created by a 120 GeV hadron beam in a 50 μm pitch strip detector fabricated on each diamond sample before and after irradiation. We irradiated one group of samples with 70 MeV protons, a second group of samples with fast reactor neutrons (defined as energy greater than 0.1 MeV), and a third group of samples with 200 MeV pions, in steps, to (8.8±0.9) × 1015 protons/cm2, (1.43±0.14) × 1016 neutrons/cm2, and (6.5±1.4) × 1014 pions/cm2, respectively. By observing the charge induced due to the separation of electron–hole pairs created by the passage of the hadron beam through each sample, on an event-by-event basis, as a function of irradiation fluence, we conclude all datasets can be described by a first-order damage equation and independently calculate the damage constant for 70 MeV protons, fast reactor neutrons, and 200 MeV pions. We find the damage constant for diamond irradiated with 70 MeV protons to be 1.62±0.07(stat)±0.16(syst)× 10−18 cm2/(p μm), the damage constant for diamond irradiated with fast reactor neutrons to be 2.65±0.13(stat)±0.18(syst)× 10−18 cm2/(n μm), and the damage constant for diamond irradiated with 200 MeV pions to be 2.0±0.2(stat)±0.5(syst)× 10−18 cm2/(π μm). The damage constants from this measurement were analyzed together with our previously published 24 GeV proton irradiation and 800 MeV proton irradiation damage constant data to derive the first comprehensive set of relative damage constants for Chemical Vapor Deposition diamond. We find 70 MeV protons are 2.60 ± 0.29 times more damaging than 24 GeV protons, fast reactor neutrons are 4.3 ± 0.4 times more damaging than 24 GeV protons, and 200 MeV pions are 3.2 ± 0.8 more damaging than 24 GeV protons. We also observe the measured data can be described by a universal damage curve for all proton, neutron, and pion irradiations we performed of Chemical Vapor Deposition diamond. Finally, we confirm the spatial uniformity of the collected charge increases with fluence for polycrystalline Chemical Vapor Deposition diamond, and this effect can also be described by a universal curve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207