MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3098977393 · doi:10.1180/mgm.2020.88

Manganoarrojadite-(KNa), KNa<sub>5</sub>MnFe<sub>13</sub>Al(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>11</sub>(PO<sub>3</sub>OH)(OH)<sub>2</sub>, a new arrojadite-group mineral from the Palermo No. 1 mine, New Hampshire, USA

2020· article· en· W3098977393 on OpenAlexaff
Inna S. Lykova, Ralph Rowe, Glenn Poirier, Kate Helwig, Henrik Friis

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMohs scale of mineral hardnessCrystallographyCrystal structureOctahedronChemistryInfrared spectroscopyMineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new arrojadite-group mineral manganoarrojadite-(KNa), ideally KNa 5 MnFe 13 Al(PO 4 ) 11 (PO 3 OH)(OH) 2 , was found in a phosphate-bearing granite pegmatite at the Palermo No. 1 mine, New Hampshire, USA. It forms anhedral grains up to 1 × 1.5 cm in size combined in aggregates with vivianite, goyazite, quartz and calcite. The mineral is olive green with a pale green streak and vitreous to greasy lustre. The cleavage is good in one direction. The Mohs hardness is 4½. D calc is 3.53 g/cm 3 . Manganoarrojadite-(KNa) is optically biaxial (–), α = 1.658(2), β = 1.666(2), γ = 1.670(2), 2V meas. = 67(1)° and 2V calc. = 70° (589 nm). The infrared spectrum is reported. The composition (wt.%) is Na 2 O 6.97, K 2 O 1.78, CaO 0.31, MgO 2.17, MnO 12.30, FeO 31.17, Al 2 O 3 2.43, P 2 O 5 40.48, F 0.30, H 2 O 1.32, O = F 2 –0.13, total 99.10. The empirical formula calculated on the basis of 12 P and (O+OH+F) = 50 apfu is Na 4.73 K 0.80 Ca 0.12 Mg 1.13 Mn 2+ 3.65 Fe 2+ 9.13 Al 1.00 P 12.00 O 46.59 OH 3.08 F 0.33 . The ideal structural formula is A 1 K A 2 Na B 1 Na B 2 Na Na1,2 Na 2 Na3 □ C Mn M Fe 13 Al(PO 4 ) 11 (PO 3 OH) W (OH) 2 . The mineral is monoclinic, Cc , a = 16.5345(3), b = 10.0406(2), c = 24.6261(5) Å, β = 105.891(2)°, V = 3932.09(14) Å 3 and Z = 4. The strongest reflections of the powder X-ray diffraction pattern [ d ,Å( I )( hkl )] are: 5.902(24)(202), 5.025(24)(020), 3.208(47)(206, $\;\bar{1}$ 32), 3.048(100)( $\bar{5}$ 14, $\bar{4}$ 24), 2.758(24)( $\bar{6}$ 02) and 2.704(70)(226). The crystal structure, refined from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data ( R 1 = 0.025), is of the arrojadite structure type. Manganoarrojadite-(KNa) is the first arrojadite-group mineral with Mn dominant on the site usually occupied by Ca and without Ca as the dominant cation at any cation site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMineralogical MagazineSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207