MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099357154

The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design

2018· article· en· W3099357154 on OpenAlexaff
H. Aihara, N. Arimoto, R. Armstrong, S. Arnouts, Neta A. Bahcall, Steven J. Bickerton, James Bosch, Kevin Bundy, P. Capak, J. H. H. Chan, Masashi Chiba, Yôko Tanaka, Yousuke Utsumi, Junko Furusawa, Akira Konno, N. Katayama, Jenny E. Greene, Keiichi Umetsu, Paul T. P. Ho, Johnny P. Greco, Ryo Higuchi, Masaomi Tanaka, Philip J. Tait, Ikuru Iwata, James E. Gunn, Takashi Hamana, Yuichi Harikane, K. Iwasawa, Masayuki Tanaka, Yasuhiro Hashimoto, Anton T. Jaelani, Takashi Hattori, Satoshi Kawanomoto, Masao Hayashi, Yusuke Hayashi, N. Suzuki, Kenneth C. Wong, Bau-Ching Hsieh, Chiaki Hikage, Tomonori Usuda, Nozomu Tominaga, Kuiyun Huang, Hung-Yu Jian, Surhud More, Song Huang, Hiroyuki Ikeda, Haruka Kusakabe, Masatoshi Imanishi, Akio Inoue, Hisakazu Uchiyama, Hitomi Yamanoi, Hiroshi Karoji, Yukiko Kamata, S. H. Suyu, Issha Kayo, Nobunari Kashikawa, Alexie Leauthaud, Atsunori Yonehara, Sogo Mineo, Jin Koda, Yoshiki Matsuoka, Shintaro Koshida, Michitaro Koike, Takashi Kojima, Tomotsugu Goto, Yutaka Komiyama, Elinor Medezinski, Yoshiki Toba, Anupreeta More, Yasushi Suto, Rachel Mandelbaum, Yusei Koyama, Shoken M. Miyama, Wei-Hao Wang, Shiro Mukae, Lihwai Lin, Yen‐Ting Lin, Yuma Sugahara, Robert H. Lupton, Ryoma Murata, M. Tanaka, Naoshi Sugiyama, Hiroko Niikura, Hironao Miyatake, Tomohisa Uchida, Naoyuki Tamura, Y. Urata, Satoshi Miyazaki, Rieko Momose, Yoshihiko Yamada, Joshua S. Speagle, Yuichi Terashima, Atsushi J. Nishizawa, Sakurako Okamoto, Yuki Moritani, Takashi J. Moriya, Hitoshi Murayama, Tomoki Morokuma, Sherry Yeh, Michael A. Strauss, Tohru Nagao, Yuki Okura, Yoshiyuki Obuchi, Masamune Oguri, Tsuyoshi Terai, Masahiro Takada, Fumiaki Nakata, Tae‐Soo Pyo, Mana Niida, Shiang‐Yu Wang, David N. Spergel, Edwin L. Turner, Yukie Oishi, N. Okabe, Tadafumi Takata, Yoshiaki Ono, Andy D. Goulding, Fumihiro Uraguchi, Hiroki Fujimori, Motohiro Enoki, Masato Onodera, Masafusa Onoue, Eiichi Egami, Ken Osato, Melanie Simet, Masami Ouchi, P. A. Price, Kazuhiro Shimasaku, Kiyoto Yabe, Seiji Fujimoto, J. D. Silverman, Atsushi Shimono, Masao Sako, Marcin Sawicki, F. Finet, Masato Shirasaki, K. G. Hełminiak, Takatoshi Shibuya, Hisanori Furusawa, Naoki Yasuda, Jean Coupon, Jun Toshikawa, Suraphong Yuma

Bibliographic record

VenueDipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSkySummitSubaru TelescopeAstronomyMagnitude (astronomy)TelescopeSurvey researchAstrophysicsRemote sensingGeographyPhysical geographySpectrograph
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) is a wide-field imaging camera on the prime focus of the 8.2-m Subaru telescope on the summit of Mauna Kea in Hawaii. A team of scientists from Japan, Taiwan, and Princeton University is using HSC to carry out a 300-night multi-band imaging survey of the high-latitude sky. The survey includes three layers: the Wide layer will cover 1400 deg2 in five broad bands (grizy), with a 5 σ point-source depth of r ≈ 26. The Deep layer covers a total of 26 deg2 in four fields, going roughly a magnitude fainter, while the UltraDeep layer goes almost a magnitude fainter still in two pointings of HSC (a total of 3.5 deg2). Here we describe the instrument, the science goals of the survey, and the survey strategy and data processing. This paper serves as an introduction to a special issue of the Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, which includes a large number of technical and scientific papers describing results from the early phases of this survey.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations776
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona)Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207