O AMARGO SABOR DO CORONA: COVID-19, UMA AMEAÇA A FORMA DE VIDA NEOLIBERAL?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desde o inicio da pandemia do “novo corona virus”, varios pensadores, filosofos, sociologos e cientistas em geral vem debrucando-se sobre o tema de como sera o amanha e de como sera a sociedade apos a pandemia. O presente texto pretende apresentar a oposicao teorica de dois dos maiores pensadores contemporâneos Slavoj Žižek e Byung-Chul Han, e apontar para uma terceira via possivel: uma conjuncao entre o “Comum” descrito por Pierre Dardot e Christian Laval e o perspectivismo amerindio de Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. A oposicao Žižek e Han reflete, em suas maximas, os extremos das utopias pos-pandemicas. De um lado Žižek com uma especie de otimismo realista, pois ve na pandemia uma possibilidade de reconstrucao de uma sociedade mais solidaria. De outro Han e seu pessimismo concretista, pois aponta que a subjetividade produto do mundo pandemico sera a de um neoliberalismo mais violento e individualista. Por fim, apresentamos outra possibilidade: o comum amerindio, perspectivista e fundado em uma antropologia que busca a simetria entre as cosmologias, estudado por Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. Fazemos isso para demarcar que nao somente a critica europeia tem algo a nos dizer sobre a pandemia e seus possiveis futuros. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16891/2317-434X.v8.e3.a2020.pp614-620
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".