A microplate screen to estimate metal-binding affinities of metalloproteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Solute-binding proteins (SBPs) from ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters play crucial roles across all forms of life in transporting compounds against chemical gradients. Some SBPs have evolved to scavenge metal substrates from the environment with nanomolar and micromolar affinities ( K D ). There exist well established techniques like isothermal titration calorimetry for thoroughly studying these metalloprotein interactions with metal ions, but they are low-throughput. For protein libraries comprised of many metalloprotein homologues and mutants, and for collections of buffer conditions and potential ligands, the throughput of these techniques is paramount. In this study, we describe an improved method termed the microITFQ-LTA and validated it using Cj NikZ, a well-characterized nickel-specific SBP (Ni-BP) from Campylobacter jejuni . We then demonstrated how the microITFQ-LTA can be designed to screen through a small collection of buffers and ligands to elucidate the binding profile of a putative Ni-BP from Clostridium carboxidivorans that we call Cc SBPII. Through this study, we showed Cc SBPII can bind to various metal ions with K D ranged over 3 orders of magnitude. In the presence of L-histidine, Cc SBPII could bind to Ni 2+ over 2000-fold more tightly, which was 11.6-fold tighter than Cj NikZ given the same ligand. Highlights an improved version of a high-throughput screen (microITFQ-LTA) is described for multiplexed elucidation of metalloprotein binding profiles validation was accomplished with the previously characterized Cj NikZ; testing was accomplished with an uncharacterized homologue herein named Cc SBPII Cc SBPII is shown to bind to multiple transition metal ions with a large range of affinities, and potentially overcome mismetallation using a simple histidine metallophore
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".