MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099891387 · doi:10.18280/acsm.440510

Influence of Meso-Structure Parameters on Wave Propagation in Soil-Rock Mixture

2020· article· en· W3099891387 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fei Zhang, Kui Wang, Yaru Dang, Guoyin Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology
KeywordsAmplitudeDiscrete element methodCompactionMineralogyGeologyPorosityParticle sizeBlock (permutation group theory)Geotechnical engineeringMechanicsSoil scienceMaterials scienceOpticsGeometryMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The macro mechanical properties of soil-rock mixture are closely related to the meso-structure features of block stones, namely, content, size, and shape. To promote the engineering application of soil-rock mixture, it is important to explore the meso-structure of the mixture, and evaluate its constitutive properties. The previous studies have shown that the wave propagation in the mixture is highly sensitive to the rock content and compaction. To clarify the meso-structure features of soil-rock mixture, this paper establishes a discrete element model of the mixture based on Particle Flow Code (PFC), investigates the wave propagation features in the model with different meso-structure parameters, and analyzes how the meso-structure parameters affect the wave propagation. The results show that: With the growing rock content, the first wave amplitude increased, while the take-off time shortened; With the growing feature size of block stone, the first wave amplitude gradually decreased, while the take-off time gradually lengthened; The soil-rock mixture containing spherical block stones had the highest first wave amplitude and shortest take-off time, while the mixture containing rectangular block stones had the lowest first wave amplitude and longest take-off time. With the growing rock content, the maximum amplitude, dominant frequency, and spectral area all exhibited an increasing trend; With the growing feature size of block stone, the maximum amplitude, dominant frequency, and spectral area all exhibited a decreasing trend.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207