MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 16744: MR Lymphatic Burden in Fontan Correlates With Outcomes

2020· article· en· W3099952003 on OpenAlexaff
Aswathy Vaikom House, Dawn David, Julien Aguet, Anne I. Dipchand, Osami Honjo, Emilie Jean‐St‐Michel, Mike Seed, Shi‐Joon Yoo, David J. Barron, Christopher Z. Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLymphatic systemFontan procedureMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineCardiologyRadiologySurgeryPathologyHeart disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The importance of the lymphatic circulation in Fontan physiology is incompletely understood and may have implications in Fontan ‘failure’. Non-invasive imaging of the lymphatic system with heavily T2-weighted MRI sequences could be a useful tool for patient surveillance and prognostication. We sought to quantify lymphatic burden in Fontan patients and correlate with clinical status. Methods: Consecutive pediatric Fontan patients, <18 years-old with clinical cardiac MRI that had routine acquisition of lymphatic 3D T2 FSE imaging performed from May 2017 to Oct 2019 were included. ‘Lymphatic burden’ was quantified by thresholding-based segmentation of the 3D T2 FSE maximum intensity projection image (fig), generating a surrogate measurement of lymphatic volume, and was performed by 2 independent readers blinded to patient status. Spearman correlation and Mann-Whitney tests were used. Results: There were 48 patients (27 males) with median age at MRI of 12.9 (9.4-14.7) years, age at Fontan of 3.3 (2.9-3.8) years, and time from Fontan at MRI of 9.2 (5.9-10.4) years. Inter-rater agreement for lymphatic burden was excellent (ICC 0.96 [0.94-0.98]). Greater lymphatic burden correlated with hospital length of stay and duration of chest tube drainage post-Fontan (r =0.423, p=0.003 and r=0.419, p=0.003). Median lymphatic burden was greater in patients that had chylous effusions post-Fontan (286 (157-492) ml vs 123 (60-271) ml, p=0.011) and in patients with composite adverse outcome (n=12) defined by heart failure (n=3), transplant assessment (n=2), recurrent effusions (n=8), Fontan thrombus (n=2), and/or PLE (n=6) post-Fontan; (458 (266-2016) ml vs 130 (272-256) ml, p=0.005). Pre-Fontan mean PA pressure and time from Fontan did not correlate with lymphatic burden (r=0.062, p=0.676 and r=0.139, p= 0.343). Conclusion: Quantification of MR lymphatic burden is a reliable tool to assess lymphatic status post-Fontan and is associated with clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→