SÍNTESIS DE LA REFORMA LABORAL EN MÉXICO (SYNTHESIS OF LABOR REFORM IN MEXICO)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: El presente artículo ofrece un breve recorrido por el escenario internacional que motivo la reforma laboral en nuestro país y que concluyo el 1 de Mayo del 2019. De manera específica se hace referencia al capítulo laboral del Tratado entre México, Estados Unidos y Canadá y los cambios sustanciales en nuestra legislación. Con las reformas realizadas, se espera una verdadera democracia sindical y la operatividad eficiente del nuevo sistema de justicia laboral, respeto autentico a los Derechos Humanos Laborales y una nueva relación de trabajo sin elementos discriminatorios, con equidad de género y sin violencia. Todo esto deberá conducir a un pacto social más incluyente y beneficioso para la clase trabajadora.Abstract: This article offers a brief overview of the international scenario that led to the labor reform in our country and which ended on May 1, 2019. Specifically, reference is made to the labor chapter of the Treaty between Mexico, the United States and Canada and the changes substantial in our legislation. With the reforms carried out, it is expected a true union democracy and the efficient operation of the new labor justice system, authentic respect for Labor Human Rights and a new employment relationship without discriminatory elements, with gender equality and without violence. All this should lead to a more inclusive and beneficial social pact for the working class.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".