MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3100092083 · doi:10.4000/clio.14588

Evamaria Freienhofer, Verkörperungen von Herrschaft. Zorn und Macht in Texten des 12. Jahrhunderts (Trends in Medieval Philology-32)

2018· article· de· W3100092083 on OpenAlexaff
Xavier Biron Quellet

Bibliographic record

VenueClio · 2018
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce livre est la version révisée et abrégée de la thèse de doctorat de l’auteure, effectuée dans le cadre du projet « Emotionalität in der Literatur des Mittelalters » à l’Université libre de Berlin. Bien que le mot n’apparaisse qu’en sous-titre, l’objet principal de ce livre est avant tout la colère des rois. En effet, l’auteure s’intéresse à la manière dont cette émotion est exprimée dans quatre textes de genres différents : un texte théorique, le Policratus de Jean de Salisbury; un texte hi...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.011
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClioSame topicGerman Literature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207