MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 14117: Clinical Characteristics and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Childhood-Onset Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

2020· article· en· W3100141487 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nicholas Marston, Larry Han, Iacopo Olivotto, Sharlene M. Day, Euan A. Ashley, Michelle Michels, Alexandre Pereira, Jodie Ingles, Christopher Semsarian, Daniel Jacoby, Steven D. Colan, Rossano Joseph, Samuel G. Wittekind, James S. Ware, Sara Saberi, Adam Helms, Seema Mital, Carolyn Y. Ho

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypertrophic cardiomyopathyInternal medicineCardiologyAtrial fibrillationCardiomyopathyNatural historyHeart failureCohortClinical endpointPediatricsHeart diseaseClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The prevalence of childhood-onset hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is lower than adult-onset disease, thus natural history is not well characterized. We aim to describe the characteristics and outcomes of childhood-onset HCM. Methods: We performed an observational cohort study of 6345 HCM patients from the Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry (SHaRe) and Toronto's SickKids hospital. HCM patients were stratified by age at diagnosis (<1 year (infancy), 1-18 years (childhood), >18 years (adulthood)) and assessed for composite endpoints reflecting heart failure (HF), life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation (AF), and an overall composite that also included stroke and death. Results: Based on defined age of diagnosis stratification, 173 (3%) patients were diagnosed in infancy, 909 (14%) in childhood, and 5263 (83%) in adulthood. Childhood-onset HCM patients had a 2%/year event rate for the overall composite endpoint, with ventricular arrhythmias representing the most common event in the 1st decade following diagnosis, and HF and AF more common by the end of the 2nd decade ( Fig, a ). Sarcomeric HCM was more common in childhood-onset HCM (62%) and carried a worse prognosis than non-sarcomeric disease, including a >2-fold increased risk of HF (HR adj 2.39 [1.36-4.20], p=0.003) and 67% increased risk of overall composite events (HR adj 1.67 [1.16-2.41], p=0.006). When compared to adult-onset HCM, childhood-onset was 36% more likely to develop life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (HR adj 1.36 [1.03-1.80]) and twice as likely to require transplant or ventricular assist device (HR adj 1.99 [1.23-3.23]) ( Fig, b ). Conclusion: Patients with childhood-onset HCM are more likely to have sarcomeric disease, carry higher risk of life-threatening ventricular arrythmias, and have greater need for advanced HF therapies. These findings provide insight into disease biology and can help improve the precision of risk prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies→French-language works237,207→