MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3100392843 · doi:10.22230/src.2020v11n1a353

Fifty Years of the Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique: Past, Present and Future

2020· article· en· W3100392843 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Brenda O’Neill

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarly and Research Communication · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsCanadian Journal of Administrative SciencesUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPublishingPoliticsLibrary scienceAudience measurementGovernment (linguistics)ArtLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de science politique (CJPS/RCSP) is a well-established international journal with a wide readership published by Cambridge University Press that serves the Canadian and international political science community. 
 Analysis In addition to reviewing the journal’s current operations, this article reviews the main challenges faced in attempting to serve as a primary outlet for research on Canadian politics and government, as well as an omnibus journal of interest to an international audience. Additionally, operating as a fully bilingual journal and adapting to the new open access publishing model precipitated by changes to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council’s Aid to Scholarly Journals program each present their own challenges.
 Conclusion and implications This article concludes by reviewing options for addressing the open access challenge.
 Contexte La Revue Canadienne de science politique/Canadian Journal of Political Science(RCSP/CJPS)est une publication internationale bilingue bien établie. Publiée par les Presses de l’Université Cambridge,elle rejoint un large public en desservant les communautés canadienne et internationale de chercheurs s’intéressant à la science politique. 
 Analyse En plus de passer en revue son fonctionnement actuel, l’article porte sur les défis que les éditeurs.trices ont dû relever depuis la publication du premier numéro. À titre d’exemple, la revue possède le double mandat de servir de débouché pour la recherche dans le champ de la politique canadienne tout en demeurant une revue omnibus s’adressant à un plus large public. À ceci s’ajoute les difficultés liées au fait de produire une revue bilingue. Enfin, plus récemment, la RCSP/CJPS a été placée devant le dilemme de se conformer ou non aux changements apportés au Programme d’aide aux revues savantesdu Conseil de recherche en sciences humaines du Canadavisant l’implantation du modèle du libre accès pour toutes les revues financées. 
 Conclusion L’article conclut en explorant les solutions à emprunter pour faire face au défi du passage au libre accès aux publications savantes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarly and Research CommunicationSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207