Lifelong, universal <i>Pneumocystis jirovecii</i> pneumonia prophylaxis: Patient uptake and adherence after kidney transplant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in transplant patients yet little is known about their adherence to prophylaxis. The goal of this study was to evaluate patient uptake and long-term adherence after implementing universal, lifelong PJP prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated an adult kidney transplant program 18-months after initiating trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) 80/400 mg thrice-weekly following a cluster of PJP cases. The protocol incorporated multi-modal patient education and drug tolerability strategies to improve adherence, including a modified re-challenge strategy for TMP-SMX intolerance. Adherence was independently confirmed by the transplant pharmacist and nurse for each patient, with an a priori target ≥ 75% population on prophylaxis. RESULTS: Initial uptake was high with 237/250 (94.8%) patients starting prophylaxis. Long-term maintenance was high with 192/237 (81.0%) patients remaining on prophylaxis at 18-months. Of the remaining 45 patients who initiated prophylaxis, 36/237 (15.2%) were non-adherent and 9/237 (3.8%) discontinued prophylaxis by 18-months. Reasons for non-adherence included gastrointestinal upset, fear of drug reactions and cost; but the majority of reasons were not delineated by the patients (31/36, 86.1%). There was a statistically significant increase in serum creatinine 3.3 µmol/L (0.3-6.3 µmol/L 95% CI) and potassium 0.08 mmol/L (0.03-0.15 mmol/L 95% CI) in those prescribed TMP-SMX with only 3/237 (1.3%) patients discontinuing TMP-SMX for an increase in creatinine. CONCLUSION: High rates of patient uptake (94.8%) and long-term adherence (81.0%) were observed after implementing universal lifelong PJP prophylaxis. This may be due in part to the in-depth patient education and drug tolerability strategies employed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".