MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3100579700 · doi:10.1097/ncm.0000000000000425

Roles, Training, and Qualifications of a Case Manager in the Canadian Health Care Industry

2020· review· en· W3100579700 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tobias Mwandala

Bibliographic record

VenueProfessional Case Management · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)BusinessCase managerCase managementHealth careMEDLINENursingNurse managerPsychologyMedical educationKnowledge managementComputer scienceMedicineProcess managementPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to explore primary roles, training, competencies, and qualifications of a case manager in the Canadian health care industry and how to improve case management practice in Canada. PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTING: Case managers' primary practice setting investigated in this article is the Canadian health care industry, which includes clinics, hospitals, continuing care, short-term and long-term care facilities, as well as palliative and end-of-life care settings. CONCLUSION: The main role of case managers is to help clients meet their goals. Assessment, monitoring, interpersonal communication, and collaboration are essential roles and competencies of case managers. Many case managers come from regulated health care professions and have prior years of professional experience, and many of them come from a nursing profession. This article is a narrative review based on the current literature about case managers' roles, training, and competencies in the Canadian health care industry and how to improve Canadian case management practice. Certification and standardization of case managers in Canada are needed to better understand the roles, training, and qualifications of case managers in the Canadian health care industry. IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE: Case managers require skills in assessment, monitoring, cultural competency, interpersonal communication, collaboration, coordinating, and advocating for resources and services to meet clients' goals in the health care industry. Case managers must also consider how to combat and address other social determinants of health such as a client's social economic status, literacy, income, employment, and working conditions that influence client's health. Ongoing professional development for case managers is fundamental in achieving effective case management practice. Finally, it is important to have case management certification in Canada in order to better understand case manager's roles and qualifications in the Canadian health care industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.533
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProfessional Case ManagementSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207