Mid-trimester microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and the risk of preterm birth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the rate of mid-trimester microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) in asymptomatic women and its association with preterm birth.Study design This is a prospective cohort study of asymptomatic women undergoing mid-trimester amniocentesis for genetic testing between 14 and 24 weeks of gestation. For each participant, a sample of amniotic fluid was incubated in an aerobic and anaerobic facultative culture media and another sample was tested for the presence of specific Mycoplasma species (Ureaplasma urealyticum, Ureaplasma parvum, and Mycoplasma hominis) using quantitative-PCR. Results were not revealed to the participants or their health care providers. All participants were followed until delivery. MIAC was defined by a positive culture or a positive PCR for Mycoplasma species. The primary outcome was a spontaneous preterm birth or preterm premature rupture of membranes before 35 weeks of gestation.Results We included 812 women at a median gestational age of 16 5/7 (interquartile: 15 6/7–17 4/7) weeks. Twenty-six (3.2%) had a spontaneous delivery before 35 weeks. We observed no case of positive PCR for Mycoplasma species and 4 (0.5%) cases of positive culture that were all considered to be skin contaminants. None of those four cases was associated with preterm birth. Nulliparity, low family income and history of preterm birth were associated with spontaneous delivery before 35 weeks.Conclusion We found no case of mid-trimester MIAC using a combination of culture and Mycoplasma-specific PCR techniques in a large cohort of low-risk asymptomatic pregnant women. We estimate that mid-trimester MIAC is rare in low-risk population but more sensitive and broad-range microbiologic techniques, such as 16S DNA detection by PCR, could be further evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".