MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 15931: Associated Genetic and Non-Cardiac Anomalies and Outcomes in Prenatally Detected Tetralogy of Fallot

2020· article· en· W3100985474 on OpenAlexaff
Rishav Sharma, Lisa K. Hornberger, Oana Caluseriu, Karen Y. Niederhoffer, Luke Eckersley, Timothy Colen, Lily Lin, Michelle Rushfeldt, Rose He, Angela McBrien

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetralogy of FallotMedicinePulmonary atresiaPrenatal diagnosisTrisomyDouble outlet right ventricleCardiologyInternal medicineDown syndromeFetal echocardiographyGenetic counselingAtrioventricular Septal DefectGreat arteriesFetusHeart diseasePediatricsPregnancyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Historically, prenatal detection of tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) was poor and around 60% had major extracardiac (ECA) or genetic anomalies. Recently, prenatal detection of ToF has improved, along with a wider range of genetic testing options. Knowledge of outcomes and risk of associated anomalies is crucial for prenatal counselling. We hypothesize that prenatal ToF now has a different risk profile for ECAs and genetic anomalies than previously reported. Methods: A retrospective study of all fetuses with a diagnosis of ToF in our Fetal Cardiology program from 2012-2019. ToF type double outlet right ventricle was excluded. Pre and postnatal charts and imaging reports were reviewed for ToF subtype, additional cardiac and non-cardiac diagnoses and outcomes. Results: Of 83 cases, 49 had standard ToF, 24 pulmonary atresia (14 with major collateral arteries, 10 without), and 10 absent pulmonary valve. There was ≥1 ECA in 41% (34/83), including 6% (5/83) with 2 and 4% (3/83) with 3. ECA sub-types were: 10 gastrointestinal, 8 neurological, 8 pulmonary, 7 renal, 4 musculoskeletal, and 8 others. Of 76 with genetic testing, 37% (28/76) had genetic anomalies (32% (9/28) Trisomy 21, 29% (8/28) 22q11 deletion, 7% (2/28) Trisomy 18, 7% (2/28) Trisomy 13, and 25% (7/28) other). Additional diagnoses: 4% (3/76) VACTERL spectrum, 1% (1/76) possible teratogenic effect. Right aortic arch was associated with 22q11 deletion (28% (7/25) vs 2% (1/51) p<0.001). ToF with atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) was strongly associated with Trisomy 21 (100%, 3/3 tested). Those with ≥1 ECA were more likely to have a genetic abnormality (52% (17/33) vs 24% (9/37), p<0.05). Outcomes were: 22% (18/83) termination, 5% (4/83) intrauterine fetal deaths and 72% (60/83) livebirths, with 1 lost to follow-up. Of live births, there were 3% (2/60) neonatal and 7% (4/60) late deaths, and 90% (54/60) were alive at last follow-up (mean age 3.5±2.4 years). Conclusion: ECAs are less common in prenatally diagnosed ToF in the modern era, however the rate of genetic diagnoses is similar to previously published data. ToF with right aortic arch and ToF with AVSD in particular have strong genetic associations. Additionally, genetic diagnoses are more common in those with an ECA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→