MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3101210944 · doi:10.1190/gpr2020-038.1

Insights gained after five years of continuous GPR use in potash mines

2020· article· en· W3101210944 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venue18th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Golden, Colorado, 14–19 June 2020 · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotashGround-penetrating radarMining engineeringHazardous wasteGeologyMine safetyRadarArchaeologyEngineeringGeographyWaste managementCoal miningTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Potash is a mineral used primarily in fertilizers, that has been mined in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada for approximately sixty years. Continuous Boring Machines (borers) are used to mechanically cut the potash ore out of potash seams. Geological anomalies are periodically encountered during mining that can create instabilities above the mining rooms. These instabilities can be hazardous to personnel and equipment. Subtle anomalies can be difficult to visually identify within the mining rooms. Such scenarios are concerning because falls-of-ground can occur with little to no warning. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is well suited to identifying anomalies above mining rooms before the ground conditions become hazardous. GPR has been used in the Saskatchewan potash mines for over 40 years. In 2013, GPR was integrated with Nutrien’s borers as a safety device, with installation on production borers commencing in 2015. There are now 32 borers equipped with GPR at 4 mines, which produce approximately 22 million tonnes of ore per year. The borer operators quickly accepted the GPR technology as it was an effective early warning device for hazardous conditions. This paper will discuss several successes and challenges faced including training of personnel on how to use the technology, and maintenance of the instrumentation. Furthermore, there were interpretation challenges due both to the position of GPR on the borers and that only one antenna is installed per borer. To address these shortcomings, we have developed and tested a new prototype which will be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it