Functional Group Protection: The Pohl Synthesis of β-1,4-Mannuronate Oligomers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
D. Srinivasa Reddy of the National Chemical Laboratory converted (Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 2090) the selenide 1 to the alkene 2 under ozonolysis conditions. Takamitsu Hosoya of the Tokyo Medical and Dental University found (Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 8745) that even highly strained alkynes such as 4 can be generated from a sulfinyl vinyl triflate 3. An alkyne can be protected as the dicobalt hexacarbonyl complex. Joe B. Gilroy and Mark S. Workentin of the University of Western Ontario found (Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 6647) that following click chemistry on a non-protected distal alkyne, deprotection of 5 to 6 could be effected by exposure to TMNO. Stefan Bräse of the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and Irina A. Balova of Saint Petersburg State University showed (J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 5546) that the bend of the Co complex of 7 enabled ring-closing metathesis, leading after deprotection to 8. Morten Meldal of the University of Copenhagen devised (Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 1433) 9, the base-labile protected form of the aldehyde 10. Nicholas Gathergood of Dublin City University and Stephen J. Connon of the University of Dublin developed (Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 188) an imidazolium catalyst for the exchange deprotection of 11 to 13, with the inexpensive aldehyde 12 as the acceptor. Peter J. Lindsay-Scott of Eli Lilly demonstrated (Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 476) that on exposure to KF, the isoxazole 14 unraveled to the nitrile 15. Masato Kitamura of Nagoya University observed (Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 6559) that the allyl ester of 16 could be removed to give 17, with the other alkene not affected. Benzyl ethers are among the most common of alcohol protecting groups. Yongxiang Liu and Maosheng Cheng of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University showed (Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 1029) that 18 could be converted to 19 simply by exposure to benzyl alcohol in the presence of a gold catalyst. Reko Leino of Åbo Akademi University developed (Synthesis 2015, 47, 1749) an iron catalyst for the reductive benzylation of 20 to 21. Related results (not illustrated) were reported (Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 1778) by Chae S. Yi of Marquette University.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".