MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3101614763 · doi:10.1115/detc2001/vib-21443

Steady State Vibrations of a Piecewise Linear System

2001· article· en· W3101614763 on OpenAlex
Reza N. Jazar, M. F. Golnaraghi, Douglas A. Swanson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibration isolationNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Piecewise linear functionStiffnessMathematicsLinear systemMathematical analysisVibrationDeflection (physics)Displacement (psychology)PhysicsComputer scienceStructural engineeringClassical mechanicsEngineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper we examine the dynamics of a mechanical system with a piecewise linear damping and stiffness, which is characterized as a strongly nonlinear system. Searching for the exact steady state periodic response of piecewise linear systems for harmonic excitations, lead to a set of transcendental equations which should be solved numerically. The strong nonlinear characteristic of the system is the reason for failure of most traditional perturbation methods in providing an approximated frequency response. In this paper we show that the averaging method of Krylov-Bogoliobuv-Mitropolsky (or multiple time scale method) may be used to find the behavior of this type of system. Optimization of linear vibration isolators and engine mounts has a straightforward solution: the stiffness should be as soft as possible. Static deflection and maximum allowable relative mount displacement (rattle space) determine the limit of mount softness. Dividing the travel space into two (or more) stages enables us to use an isolator with a different stiffness for each stage. This is a simple method to have a more advanced passive mount isolator. However, this also makes the system piecewise linear, which has a strongly nonlinear behavior if the ratio of the two stages are far from unity. Asymmetrical bilinear systems, with different stiffness and damping values for compression and tension, are used when the relative motion in negative direction is more (or less) critical than in positive direction. Sensitivity analysis of the system shows that the difference in the damping plays a more important role than the stiffness difference in these systems. In this paper, using averaging method, we examine the nonlinear behavior of piecewise linear mounts at resonance, and provide a comprehensive analysis which may be used to better design for these kind of vibration isolators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it