MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3101722601 · doi:10.1109/ojemb.2020.3036742

The COSMIC Bubble Helmet: A Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation System for COVID-19

2020· article· en· W3101722601 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vionarica Gusti, Wan Wu, Arpan Grover, Sabian Chiu, Kai-Wen Su, Erica Ma, Chanelle Chow, Ella Sit, Jun Hyeok Lim, Abhijit Pandhari, Mattias Park, Ryan Lee, Faisal Shahril, Shawn T. Lim, Christopher Nguan, Dan Driedger, Avinash Sinha, Ivan G. Scrooby, Neilson McLean, Michael W. Lee, Tyler D. Yan, The COSMIC Team

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsAbbotsford Veterinary ClinicFraser HealthBC Research (Canada)Vancouver General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaSurrey Memorial HospitalUniversity of VictoriaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)AerosolizationAcute respiratory distressCabin pressurizationPersonal protective equipmentSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Mechanical ventilationCOSMIC cancer databaseVentilation (architecture)Continuous positive airway pressureMaterials scienceMedicineAnesthesiaMechanical engineeringEngineeringLungPhysicsComposite materialInhalationInternal medicineAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Goal:COSMIC Medical, a Vancouver-based open-source volunteer initiative, has designed an accessible, affordable, and aerosol-confining non-invasive positive-pressure ventilator (NIPPV) device, known as the COSMIC Bubble Helmet (CBH). This device is intended for COVID-19 patients with mild-to-moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome.System Design: CBH is composed of thermoplastic polyurethane, which creates a flexible neck seal and transparent hood. This device can be connected to wall oxygen, NIPPVs including Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure, and mechanical ventilators.Discussion: Justification of CBH design components relied on several factors, predominantly the safety and comfort of patients and healthcare providers.Conclusion:CBH has implications within and outside of the pandemic, as an alternative to invasive mechanical ventilation methods. We have experimentally verified that CBH is effective in minimizing aerosolization risks and performs at specified clinical requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and BiologySame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207