Diaphragmatic Hernia following Pediatric Liver Transplantation: An Underappreciated Complication Prone to Recur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Postoperative diaphragmatic hernia (DH) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication following pediatric liver transplantation (LT). In the current literature, a total of 49 such hernias have been reported in 17 case series. We present eight additional cases, three of which reoccurred after surgical correction, and review the current literature with a focus on recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample included children (<18 years of age) who underwent LT between June 2013 and June 2020 at five large transplant centers and who subsequently presented with DH. During the study period, a total of 907 LT was performed. Eight DH were recognized, and risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: For the eight children with DH, the mean age at LT was 28.0 (5-132) months. All patients with a DH received left lateral segment split grafts except one, who received a full left lobe. The mean weight at time of LT was 11.8 (6.6-34) kg. Two patients had a primary abdominal muscle closure, and six had a temporary silastic mesh closure. All eight children presented with a right posterolateral DH. The small bowel was herniated in the majority of cases. Symptoms reported included nausea, vomiting, and respiratory distress. Two patients were asymptomatic, and discovery was incidental. All patients underwent prompt primary surgical repair. Three DH hernias (37.5%) recurred despite successful surgical correction. CONCLUSION: DH following liver transplant with technical variant grafts may be underreported and is prone to recur despite surgical correction. A better understanding of the pathophysiology and more thorough reporting may help increase awareness. Early detection and prompt surgical management are the cornerstones of a successful outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".