Development of Stable and Simple Finasteride 333-μg/mL Suspensions that Minimize Occupational Exposure.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Finasteride is not commercially available in a liquid format, which stimulated the development of a stable and simple finasteride suspension formulation. The objectives of this work were to develop and test a finasteride suspension for 1) simplicity to compound, 2) pharmaceutical acceptability, 3) stability, and 4) potential for occupational exposure. The stability of commercial 5-mg finasteride tablets (50 mg/150 mL) was evaluated in water, Oral Mix, and OralMix SF in amber polyethylene terephthalate bottles at 25°C or 4°C. Additional stability studies were carried out using sugar-free Finasteride Powder USP in amber polyethylene terephthalate bottles and tablets in water in polypropylene oral syringes. On study days 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, 38, 49, 63, and 90, the finasteride concentration was determined using a validated stability-indicating liquid chromatographic method. The potential occupational airborne exposure was evaluated by attempting to measure finasteride in 1000 liters of room air following shaking and nebulization. Finasteride suspension/dispersion formulations were prepared in water, Oral Mix, and Oral Mix SF from tablets and pure powder. All formulations retained more than 94.3% of the initial finasteride concentration, with 95% confidence, when stored for up to 90 days at room temperature or 4°C. Simulations of occupational exposure failed to demonstrate the presence of finasteride in room air following attempts to nebulize finasteride mixtures. We conclude that 333-µg/mL suspension/dispersions of finasteride in water or Oral Mix products will have more than 94.3% of the initial finasteride concentration remaining after 90 days, regardless of the formulation, container, or storage temperature. Although we could not detect finasteride in room air, given the analytical limits of the study, we estimate that exposure would unlikely exceed 3.6-µg/1000 liters of room air. Nevertheless, since current regulations are based on "no safe limit," use of primary engineering controls and personal protective equipment as appropriate is recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".