MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3102385934

Pristutnost neuropatske boli kod pacijenata nakon transplantacije bubrega i nefrektomije

2020· dissertation· sh· W3102385934 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ivana Crnković

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagesh
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeuropathic painMcGill Pain QuestionnaireIncidence (geometry)NephrectomyNephrologyKidney transplantationQuality of life (healthcare)TransplantationDiabetes mellitusInternal medicinePhysical therapyVisual analogue scaleAnesthesiaKidney
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Neuropathic pain is defined as the result of disease or damage to the central or peripheral nervous system. Chronic pain, especially neuropathic pain, greatly affects the quality of life in patients after kidney transplantation and nephrectomy, so it is very important to recognize it as early as possible. Aim: The objectives of the study were to determine whether there is a difference between patients undergoing kidney transplantation and patients who underwent nephrectomy in relation to the incidence of neuropathic pain, and whether the incidence of neuropathic pain is higher in patients with diabetes, psychiatric diagnosis, and previous surgery. Methods: This cross- sectional study was conducted at the Department of Urology, Urology Clinic and Nephrology-Transplant Clinic, Clinical Hospital Merkur. Data from 80 patients were analyzed, 45 of them had a kidney transplant and 35 had a nephrectomy. Validated questionnaires are used to assess pain, the VAS pain scale, and the pain detect questionnaire translated into Croatian was used to assess neuropathic pain. Results: Most respondents have a negative result according to the pain detect questionnaire (92.5%). Gender, lifestyle habits, diagnosis of diabetes, and previous surgeries showed no significant differences from the pain detection questionnaire. Older subjects (61-84 years) had significantly more neuropathic pain present compared to younger subjects (p = 0.04). Patients diagnosed with psychiatric illness had a higher number of adverse outcomes according to the pain detection questionnaire (p = 0,019) as well as a higher intensity of pain according to the VAS scale at the time of filling the inquiry (p = 0,002), the strongest pain in the last 4 weeks (p= 0,001) and average pain in the last 4 weeks (p = 0,003) compared to patients without a diagnosis of psychiatric illness. Conclusion: The obtained results show that there is no difference in the incidence of neuropathic pain in patients after transplantation and nephrectomy. Diabetes and previous surgeries have not shown statistical significance in the incidence of neuropathic pain. Subjects who had been diagnosed with a psychiatric diagnosis had significantly greater pain and more unclear results on the pain detect questionnaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPain Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→