Bibliographic record
Abstract
After the Roman civil war had broken out in 49 b.c., Pharnakes ii (63-47 b.c.) tried to regain the Pontic territories in Asia Minor.These would have been his by inheritance, had they not fallen under direct or indirect Roman domination in the course of the Third Mithradatic War (73-63 b.c.).While Caesar was fighting in Alexandria (48/47 b.c.), Pharnakes defeated the Roman legions under Cn.Domitius Calvinus at Nikopolis.The proconsul had the support of two kings: Deiotaros, who was in control of the Tolistobogian and Trokmian tetrarchies of Galatia, but had lost his Eastern-Pontic and Micro-Armenian territories to Pharnakes, and Ariobarzanes iii, who was the ruler of Kappadokia, but had been deprived of the northern parts of his realm by the Bosporan intruder.Despite this initial success, Pharnakes suffered a heavy defeat at Zela at the hands of Caesar, who reported to Rome in telegram style with his famous words veni, vidi, vici. 1 The king retreated to Sinope, whence he shipped back to the Bosporos.In the meantime, his former deputy Asandros had revolted against him.Although Pharnakes was able to take back Theodosia and Pantikapaion, he was killed in combat shortly thereafter. 2 Many thanks go to my friends
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".