MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3102676112 · doi:10.7834/phoenix.73.1-2.0086

The Course of Pharnakes II's Pontic and Bosporan Campaigns in 48/47 B.C.

2019· article· en· W3102676112 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Coşkun

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCourse (navigation)Ancient historyArtHistoryPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After the Roman civil war had broken out in 49 b.c., Pharnakes ii (63-47 b.c.) tried to regain the Pontic territories in Asia Minor.These would have been his by inheritance, had they not fallen under direct or indirect Roman domination in the course of the Third Mithradatic War (73-63 b.c.).While Caesar was fighting in Alexandria (48/47 b.c.), Pharnakes defeated the Roman legions under Cn.Domitius Calvinus at Nikopolis.The proconsul had the support of two kings: Deiotaros, who was in control of the Tolistobogian and Trokmian tetrarchies of Galatia, but had lost his Eastern-Pontic and Micro-Armenian territories to Pharnakes, and Ariobarzanes iii, who was the ruler of Kappadokia, but had been deprived of the northern parts of his realm by the Bosporan intruder.Despite this initial success, Pharnakes suffered a heavy defeat at Zela at the hands of Caesar, who reported to Rome in telegram style with his famous words veni, vidi, vici. 1 The king retreated to Sinope, whence he shipped back to the Bosporos.In the meantime, his former deputy Asandros had revolted against him.Although Pharnakes was able to take back Theodosia and Pantikapaion, he was killed in combat shortly thereafter. 2 Many thanks go to my friends

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicAncient Near East HistoryFrench-language works237,207